Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2001/11/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light
From: David Rodgers <drodgers@swiftnet.com>
Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2001 10:32:41 -0800
References: <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD058D02E@cca_exchng.ccapr.com> <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD07B6D93@cca_exchng.ccapr.com> <FE389C5B196ED511AB210090273CEFD058D02E@cca_exchng.ccapr.com>
Paul,
Anything and Leica make a great combination. Heck, even digital and Leica.
As long as Leica is in there somewhere! When the light gets low, there is
no substitute! Only mere wanna-bees!
Why is it people always compare in terms of "this appears to equal Leica",
and not the other way around?
Dave
At 04:08 PM 11/15/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I agree that Nikon and Leica make a great combination.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from Paul Chefurka <chefurka@home.com> (Re: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)
In reply to:
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@ccapr.com> (RE: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)
Message from "B. D. Colen" <bdcolen@ccapr.com> (RE: [Leica] Non-Leica lenses for available light)