Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2001/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
From: "Colin" <CJV@home.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 20:09:28 -0500

I'm biting my tongue.  Ow.  Please don't ask that anymore :D

Regards, 
Colin
http://www.availabledark.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us 
> [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of 
> Marc James Small
> Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 2:37 PM
> To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> Subject: RE: [Leica] NOCTILUX/ Canon
> 
> 
> At 03:55 PM 12/11/01 -0600, Jeffery L.Smith wrote:
> >I have heard nothing but mediocre reviews of the 0.95 Canon 
> lens. For 
> >fast lenses, the ranking is always:
> >
> >Noctilux 1.0	best
> >Canon 50/1.2	okay
> >Canon 50/.95	avoid
> >
> 
> What about the Canon EF 50mm f/1 lens?
> 
> Marc
> 
> msmall@roanoke.infi.net  FAX:  +540/343-7315
> Cha robh bąs fir gun ghrąs fir!
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see 
> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-> users/unsub.html
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html