Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: rude
From: Joe Leung <jcyleung8@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 15:37:01 -0800
References: <200202032309.SAA27218@cliff.concentric.net>

George,

No, if we point out to him POLITELY that what he did was wrong and
unacceptable.

Joe L.

- ----- Original Message -----
From: "George Lottermoser" <imagist@concentric.net>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Sunday, February 03, 2002 3:09 PM
Subject: RE: [Leica] Re: Re: rude


> jsmith45@bellsouth.net (Jeffery Smith)2/3/0212:22 AM
>
> > I spammed him too.
>
>
> I don't wish start a war here but I truly do wish to understand.
>
> If we call the original fellow, who expressed his unsolicited and
> uninformed opinion to Pascal, rude. And I agree with the use of
> that label for his behavior.
> And we consider spam rude, And I agree with the use of that label
> for spamming.
> And then we spam the original guy - would it be fair to say we
> are rude as well?
>
> This whole affair seems a good example of how feuds, wars, mob
> behavior and conflicts begin and continue.
>
> I don't get it. Am I missing something here?
>
> George
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@concentric.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: Re: rude)