Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/02/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: rude
From: "Greg J. Lorenzo" <gregj.lorenzo@shaw.ca>
Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2002 17:12:51 -0700
References: <200202032309.SAA27218@cliff.concentric.net>

I agree with George's thinking on this.

Better to ignore him as he's beyond enlightenment.

Regards,

Greg

George Lottermoser wrote:

>jsmith45@bellsouth.net (Jeffery Smith)2/3/0212:22 AM
>
>>I spammed him too.
>>
>
>
>I don't wish start a war here but I truly do wish to understand.
>
>If we call the original fellow, who expressed his unsolicited and 
>uninformed opinion to Pascal, rude. And I agree with the use of
>that label for his behavior.
>And we consider spam rude, And I agree with the use of that label
>for spamming.
>And then we spam the original guy - would it be fair to say we
>are rude as well?
>
>This whole affair seems a good example of how feuds, wars, mob
>behavior and conflicts begin and continue.
>
>I don't get it. Am I missing something here?
>
>George
>
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from George Lottermoser <imagist@concentric.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: Re: rude)