Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Town hack
From: "Barney Quinn" <Barney.Quinn@noaa.gov>
Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2002 20:10:20 -0500
References: <191.3539f71.29b80098@aol.com>

Seth,

What if we hooked up a proroscope to a Leica? Humm....which model to select.

Barney

SthRosner@aol.com wrote:

> In a message dated 3/6/02 6:01:31 PM Eastern Standard Time,
> markc@binaryfaith.com writes:
>
> > Wouldn't a noctilux be better? I mean c'mon its short and wide.. And
> >  works better under low light. :)
>
> > On Behalf Of gbennett@lainet.com
> >  Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 2:16 PM
> >  To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
> >  Subject: Re: [Leica] Town hack
> >
> >  Quoting Brian Reid <reid@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>:
> >
> >  > I have contacted Yahoo and I know who sent this message. I just need
> >  > to decide what I'm going to do about it.
> >
> >  How about implanting a 90 Summicron in his low light area, as he
> >  suggests?
> >
> .......c'mon people, this is supposed to be about Leicas, not about
> proctoscopy.
>
> seth       lak 9
>
> (now see, there I'm kidding but you can't hear the inflection in my voice nor
> see the smile on my kisser and someone out there is going to read that
> seriously).
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from SthRosner@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Town hack)