Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/29

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: Re: [Leica] Was Leica Marketed As A Professional Camera Or As A HobbiestHappy-Snapper?
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2002 00:06:25 -0800
References: <OF5C7C4B68.9DD75CD8-ON85256B8A.006FAB99@customs.treas.gov> <3.0.2.32.20020328174651.015a89e8@roanoke.infi.net>
 
They still do. I'm always asked for a particular format, specifically
120 and 4x5. That's because the 20&30 something crowd can barely shoot
coming out of photo school. 
I do get asked for digital, but not as often.
Slobodan Dimitrov

Marc James Small wrote:
> -- Editors and art directors micro-managed the gear photographers used to
> ensure that the photograph would be printable.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
In reply to: Message from CHRISTOPHER.CHEN@customs.treas.gov (Re: [Leica] was leica marketed as a professional camera or a hobbiest camera?)
Message from Marc James Small <msmall@infi.net> ([Leica] Was Leica Marketed As A Professional Camera Or As A Hobbiest Happy-Snapper?)