Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/03/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended
From: Ken Wilcox <klw.51@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 31 Mar 2002 16:05:30 -0500
References: <20020331164937.GHEN29627.lakemtao01.cox.net@smtp.east.cox.net>

I'm envious of your proximity. I shot a couple of rolls last summer, using 
it for the first time in several years. Kodalux sent the first back 2 and 
half months later with dirt stuck all over it. They lost the second one.

Ken Wilcox


At 03:25 PM 03/31/2002, you wrote:
>For me, I drive down to the Kodak processing plant, drop the film off, and 
>pick it up the next day. Never had a roll badly developed. For others, 
>It's a matter of buying a Kodak mailer and sending it out. I've heard 
>people say they received terrible processing from Kodak. I don't know how 
>to answer them; I've never, never had even one slide poorly processed.
>
>Allan
>
>
>On Sunday, March 31, 2002, at 11:49 AM, rclompus@cox.net wrote:
>>
>>How difficult is it to get a roll of Kodachome 64 developed?
>
>--
>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- ------------------------
Ken Wilcox
klw.51(at)comcast.net

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Ken Wilcox <klw.51@comcast.net> ([Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)
Reply from Marc James Small <msmall@infi.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)
Reply from Tina Manley <images@InfoAve.Net> (Re: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)
In reply to: Message from rclompus@cox.net (Re: [Leica] Re: the fling is over/my search has ended)