Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/06/23
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]It is certainly a very handy camera to have. I love my Contax-T (I'm getting into some risky territory here) because it fits it my front trouser pocket. I have carried it around all day without noticing it. I'm going to try some dead reckoning shooting and some hyperfocal shooting with my Kiev (Minox knockoff). What speed film do you ususally carry in the Rollei? Jeffery At 10:30 PM 6/23/2002 +0200, you wrote: >Jeffery, > >The picture in question was taken either at the hyperfocal setting or infinity >at a fairly small aperture, f8 or f11, I do not remember. Most of the time >I do >make a rough estimate of the distance, sometimes I have to be quite careful >(like on my portrait of a bouncer in London, shot at f2.8 and 1/30). In most >situations the results are surprisingly accurate. Of course, if the subject is >moving and the light is such that f2.8 is needed, then the Rollei is certainly >not a good instrument. But overall, I will say that I achieve a higher >percentage of correctly focused shots with the Rollei than I did with an >autofocus P&S when I used that as my pocket camera. > >Nathan > >Jeffery Smith wrote: > > > Nathan, > > > > I can see why so many Rollei 35 owners are enthusiastic about the Rollei > > 35. The images have nice sharpness and tonality. Do you attempt to guess > > the focus, or do you shoot at hyperfocal distance. I believe for that lens, > > it is 21 feet at f/8. > > > > Jeffery Smith > >-- >Nathan Wajsman >Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland > >e-mail: wajsman@webshuttle.ch >mobile: +41 78 732 1430 > >Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2002.htm >General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm > > > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html