Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/10/26

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] too many frames on roll
From: Phil Stiles <stiles@metrocast.net>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2002 08:20:08 -0400
References: <154843BA-E820-11D6-8900-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <3DBA047D.F81034B3@hale-pohaku.com> <000e01c27c9e$36ffb580$647ba8c0@sd.cox.net> <000901c27ca2$adc8cf40$0a3aa8c0@almond>

> | Do any of you guys and gals have a problem with getting
> more than 36 shots
> | on a roll? I seem to get extra frames at each end of a
> roll 00 and 0 at the
> | begining and frame "E" after frame 36. this really messes
> me up when it
> | comes time to cut into strips of five.

With every batch of films developed, I have some tag ends from each 
roll. These get their own plastic sheet, and when the seven slots are 
filled, I print them.  On this topic, I do try to keep the lens cap on 
when advancing the first framss of a roll of color print film. Too often 
the lab will print these and charge for them. Finally, it can be 
discouraging when the first random frames are the best ones on the roll. :+)
Phil Stiles NH USA

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from John Collier <jbcollier@shaw.ca> (Re: SBLOO finder magnification: Was: [Leica] .58x or .72x?)
Message from Dennis Painter <dennis@hale-pohaku.com> (Re: SBLOO finder magnification: Was: [Leica] .58x or .72x?)
Message from "daniel" <thedmc@cox.net> ([Leica] too many frames)
Message from "Will" <wlarsen@ocsnet.net> (Re: [Leica] too many frames)