Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2002/11/05
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Decisions, decisions: Brooks Veriwide vs. RF 21mm vs. ?
From: Dante Stella <dante@umich.edu>
Date: Tue, 5 Nov 2002 19:34:01 -0500
???
Not hypothetical; assuming that they cost the same, would you buy
(a) A 21mm lens for use on a Leica-style rangefinder;
(b) A user Brooks Veriwide 100 (6x9, 47mm f/8 Super-Angulon); or
(c) A 21/2.8 SLR lens
Assume that I have enlargers to cover all of them, and bodies to fit
each of the accessory lenses.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
Replies:
Reply from "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com> (Re: [Leica] Decisions, decisions: Brooks Veriwide vs. RF 21mm vs. ?)
Reply from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (Re: [Leica] Decisions, decisions: Brooks Veriwide vs. RF 21mm vs. ?)
Reply from Henning Wulff <henningw@archiphoto.com> (Re: [Leica] Decisions, decisions: Brooks Veriwide vs. RF 21mm vs. ?)
Reply from "Jeffery L. Smith" <jsmith45@bellsouth.net> (Re: [Leica] Decisions, decisions: Brooks Veriwide vs. RF 21mm vs. ?)
Reply from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> ([Leica] Going offline for a while)
Reply from "Stuart Phillips" <stuart.phillips@rcn.com> (Re: [Leica] Decisions, decisions: Brooks Veriwide vs. RF 21mm vs. ?)