Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/11/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens
From: S Dimitrov <sld@earthlink.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2002 16:11:57 -0800
References: <000d01c28f33$e525a9b0$0316fea9@ccasony01>

I'm with you on this one. 
But I still think that the 28mm 'cron is waisted on the M, it deserves
to be on the R.
Slobodan Dimitrov


bdcolen wrote:
> 
> To each his own, John...While I actually think the old 135 2.8 with eyes
> was a pretty good rig - and a much underrate lens - when I shoot with a
> longer lens, I want the view through the lens. In fact, I prefer the
> reflex for pretty much anything over 50mm, and see the Leica 90s as fall
> backs for when I need near silence when shooting.
> 
> But I am well aware that mine very much a minority opinion - on this
> list ;-)
> 
> B. D.
> h
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "bdcolen" <bdcolen@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] 1.25 magnifier with 135mm lens)