Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/06
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Mark: That didn't come out right, I wasn't at all suggesting that you can't think. Jim Hemenway wrote: > > Mark: > > You don't think, (nah that's impossible) that it maybe, it kinda was > stolen? > -- > Jim - http://www.hemenway.com > > Mark Langer wrote: > > > > I was recently offered a 1a converted to a Standard. The jpegs indicated that the serial no. in front of the accessory shoe had been sanded off. I can't see anything else about the camera that would indicate that it isn't authentic. > > This isn't the first early rangefinderless Leica that I've seen with the serial no. effaced. Is there some reason that this would have been done that is escaping me? > > > > Curious in Ottawa, > > > > Mark > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- Jim - http://www.hemenway.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html