Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2002/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] If anyone has any suggestions, Nikon 4000 blackpoint
From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 20:40:54 +0100
References: <BA31BFB7.F0%kvj@gammanine.com> <BA31BFB7.F0%kvj@gammanine.com> <5.1.1.6.0.20021227104302.009ecc70@pop-server.twcny.rr.com>

Well I think the described problem has to do with an incorrect setting in
the advanced color menu.
There in autocontrast calculation you can set a percentage for both black
and white which are excluded.This in order to increase contrast of the scan.
If you try again with these values zeroed the result would be different.

best regards
simon jessurun
amsterdam
the netherlands
- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Ernest Nitka" <enitka@twcny.rr.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Friday, December 27, 2002 5:03 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] If anyone has any suggestions, I would be very
interested.


> Rolfe - just a side note - I too love my OS X but include a link
indicating
> a problem with scanning negatives ( not positives) with Nikon Coolscan
4000
> and 8000.  This is true when I've used Nikon Scan and is why I have gone
to
> using Vuescan for the most part.  I have only seen this one link or
> reference to this problem and am a bit suprised that there hasn't been
more
> of a cry of foul to Nikon about this.  Do you  have any knowledge about
> this or have you heard this before?
>
> Ernie
> http://www.marginalsoftware.com/LS8000Notes/autoexposure_not_working.htm
>
>
>
>
> >OSX is the best workstation OS I've ever used, and I've used just about
> >everything out there since the dawn of computing time.
> >
> >I am running Photoshop 7.01 using a Nikon 4000 scanner and Epson 1640SU
> >flatbed, both of which are supported natively under OSX. Even the latest
> >version of Nikon Scan runs natively under OSX, although I prefer Vuescan
> >for the superior scans it delivers, even at the cost of a clunkier
> >interface. FWIW, I also find Vuescan faster than Nikon Scan, probably
> >because you can choose several degrees of infrared cleaning, aka "Digital
> >Ice". With Nikon Scan, it is either on or off.
> >
> >As is probably obvious from this discussion, YMMV. For the record, I'm
> >running OSX 10.2.3, but never had any problem with the earlier versions
> >(10.1 and later) either.
> >
> >--
> >Rolfe Tessem
> >rolfe@ldp.com
> >Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
> >--
> >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Keith Johnson <kvj@gammanine.com> ([Leica] If anyone has any suggestions, I would be very interested. I know people do use this scanner in OS-X, so it can be done. I'm wondering if I need to install VueScan.)
Message from Keith Johnson <kvj@gammanine.com> ([Leica] If anyone has any suggestions, I would be very interested. I know people do use this scanner in OS-X, so it can be done. I'm wondering if I need to install VueScan.)
Message from Ernest Nitka <enitka@twcny.rr.com> (Re: [Leica] If anyone has any suggestions, I would be very interested.)