Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/02/18
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]BD: You're right... in my "calumnious" state of mind, (see Marc's post) I neglected to mention that I've gleaned some very useful information from the more rational sections of the WSJ in the past. - -- Jim - http://www.hemenway.com bdcolen wrote: > > Sorry to shock you, Jim, but the truth is that while I find the > Editorial Page and OpEd offerings of the Wall Street Journal utterly > repulsive, I think that a good deal of its news coverage ranks with the > best in the country. In fact, Ed and OpEd pages aside, the Journal is > one of the best three or four papers in America... > > B. D. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Jim > Hemenway > Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 5:15 PM > To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > Subject: [Leica] Was anti-war stuff, is now, gasp, "Some of my friends > are Republicans" > > BD: > > I too consider Austin a friend and ask, why would he read the liberal > press anymore than I, (or maybe you) would read the conservative press? > > The WSJ for example, is enough to make me vomit... so I imagine Austin > might feel the same about something like the Boston Globe/NY Times. :) > > Jim "Leica using LIBERAL Democrat", Hemenway > > http://www.hemenway.com > > bdcolen wrote: > > > > Let me try to disengage here, Austin, as I consider you a friend and > > don't want to see this deteriorate - and simply note that if that's > > the impression you have, you haven't been reading the "liberal" press > > very carefully for the past 18 months. ;-) > > > > B. D. > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html