Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/04/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Doug-- That's true, unless you are stomping all over the tundra, which people do here in the Rocky Mountains, especially at Rocky Mountain National Park. They always want to get out there, off the trails, at high altitude, and get a picture. I find myself yelling "get off the tundra!" quite a bit to folks who are smashing plants that will probably take 100 years to regenerate. Same thing with the cryptobiotic soil in Canyonlands. Very fragile stuff, and takes generations to recover once it's been smashed. Kit - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us]On Behalf Of Douglas Herr Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 12:02 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: Re: RE: [Leica] Uncertainty Principle Kit McChesney | acmefoto <kitmc@acmefoto.com> wrote: > Yes, I see what you mean about the work you do with the > critters (always gorgeous, by the way), and that's just a very > vivid, real-life example of how we do influence the "picture," > or the big picture, so to speak. I still think the quantum > physics example still applies. It even applies in landscape photos but we don't notice it 'cuz we (the observers/measurement tools) are of a much smaller scale that the stuff we're observing. In the landscape example the probablilty is very high that the things we're observing are what would have been if we had not been there :-) Doug Herr Birdman of Sacramento http://www.wildlightphoto.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html