Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/06/28
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Irving, > I agree with Chandos. In my view, Mr. Shell's attorney would be > better advised to save his arguments for a jury. I believe that > attempting to "try" a case on a photo forum or on the web does > not rate highly on the professional scale. Good grief! If you believe that's what happened, you have severe reading comprehension problems. > As for the defense fund the attorney is attempting to solicit (I > assume, for his own personal benefit), I can't conceive why I > would be motivated to contribute. Then why not simply just not respond? Perhaps there are others here who don't feel the way you do. I, personally, don't care about SNOOKYs, but I don't respond to every SNOOKY post saying that "I can't conceive why I would be interested in a SNOOKY" or whatever. Austin - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html