Re: [Leica] Bob Shell

["Barney Quinn" <Barney.Quinn@noaa.gov>]

Hi,

This is going to surprise a lot of people, perhaps most of all Austin, but I
agree with him on this one. A lot of people here either know Bob, know of Bob,
or consider him a real ( face to face ) or virtual ( on-line ) friend. I took
the comments to be no more than letting his friends know what was going on, much
the same way most of us interested in the progress of a friend who has a serious
illness.

Now, Austin, you didn't think I was going to let you off the cheap did you?
Aren't there modern perscription pills which can help you with this SNOOKY
thing! :-) Shouldn't be hard to come by, just stop deleting your spam!

Barney

Austin Franklin wrote:

> Irving,
>
> > I agree with Chandos.  In my view, Mr. Shell's attorney would be
> > better advised to save his arguments for a jury.  I believe that
> > attempting to "try" a case on a photo forum or on the web does
> > not rate highly on the professional scale.
>
> Good grief!  If you believe that's what happened, you have severe reading
> comprehension problems.
>
> > As for the defense fund the attorney is attempting to solicit (I
> > assume, for his own personal benefit), I can't conceive why I
> > would be motivated to contribute.
>
> Then why not simply just not respond?  Perhaps there are others here who
> don't feel the way you do.  I, personally, don't care about SNOOKYs, but I
> don't respond to every SNOOKY post saying that "I can't conceive why I would
> be interested in a SNOOKY" or whatever.
>
> Austin
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html