Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/14

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG newbie going to Scotland with M6TTL - is it really *that* cloudy?
From: "\(SonC\) Sonny Carter" <sonc@sonc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 22:25:07 -0500
References: <000301c34a74$f528a810$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4> <3F136F7E.50504@ldp.com>

I LOVE  Fuji Press 800, a few examples:

http://www.sonc.com/unsmile.htm

http://www.sonc.com/safecracker.htm

http://www.sonc.com/paw3/sparklers.htm

http://www.sonc.com/eric_nurse.htm

http://www.sonc.com/natchez_fog.htm

http://www.sonc.com/paw2/wedding.htm


Regards,

SonC


- ----- Original Message -----
From: "Rolfe Tessem" <rolfe@ldp.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Leica] LUG newbie going to Scotland with M6TTL - is it really
*that* cloudy?


> Don Dory wrote:
> > Hello and welcome to the LUG, Rich:
> >
> > I'm going to throw a somewhat counter proposal to you.  Fuji is offering
> > their press film at really cheap prices.  Here in Atlanta you can
> > purchase twenty rolls of the press 400 for $50.  This is the four layer
> > stuff and it looks good on paper and scanned.  Unless you intentionally
> > want lower contrast images that the Portray or NHG offers this is the
> > ticket.  It will give you similar images that you are used to with Reala
> > with two stops more speed.
> >
> > I believe the major internet outlets have similar pricing; B&H, Calumet,
> > Unique to name a few.
> >
> > My feeling is that the film stock is not as important as having enough
> > to free you to keep pushing the shutter until you have nailed the image.
> >
> > 0.02
> > Don
> > dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
> Don,
>
> I agree that the Fuji Press films are really good. I sort of looked down
> my nose at them until I tried the Press 800, which is outstanding. This
> is the film that most press photographers were using right before all
> the newspapers went digital.
>
> Having said that, when shooting color negative, there are plenty of
> opportunities to pick up contrast along the way to a print. So starting
> with a negative that has the ability to capture a large dynamic range as
> NPH does is not a bad idea. I'd rather have all the possible detail in
> the negative and choose to lose it later than not to have it in the
> first place. To my mind, this is the best argument for shooting color
> negative rather than reversal in the first place.
>
> I agree with your assessment that the Fuji Press films will deliver a
> character similar to Reala with higher speed.
>
> Rolfe
>
> --
> Rolfe Tessem      |     Lucky Duck Productions, Inc.
> rolfe@ldp.com     |     96 Morton Street
> (212) 463-0029    |     New York, Ny 10014
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "Don Dory" <dorysrus@mindspring.com> (RE: [Leica] LUG newbie going to Scotland with M6TTL - is it really *that* cloudy?)
Message from Rolfe Tessem <rolfe@ldp.com> (Re: [Leica] LUG newbie going to Scotland with M6TTL - is it really *that* cloudy?)