Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/07/22

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: RE: [Leica] Summilux vs. Summicron vs. Elmarit
From: Tom Christiansen <tomchr@softhome.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2003 08:51:20 -0700
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20030721185900.01cbdf38@tomchr.deskmail.washington.edu>

Folks,

>First, they are all good.  Now, do you need the speed of the 1.4?  If
>you don't, then go for the 60 Macro-Elmarit as it is a stunningly good
>lens at all apertures.  If the 60 is too long for your normal needs then
>the 50 Summicron is almost as good and gives you one more stop in a
>smaller size.

I could never live without a fast (or fast-ish) 50. But I did consider 
getting the macro lens - but maybe at a later time.

I've settled on the 50 Summacron-R.

Thank you everybody who pitched in on this - and on my R8 questions.


Thanks,

         Tom

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Tom Christiansen <tomchr@softhome.net> ([Leica] Summilux vs Summicron vs Elmarit)