Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/09/02

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Re: Digital back for Leica M, sequel, precision and so on
From: Grégoire Vandenschrick <gregoire.vds@skynet.be>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 12:18:22 +0200
References: <00e801c370e3$6e9c73e0$e74388d9@HomeVdschrick> <BCEKKGNGDPMOIPMEJONBCECICKAA.phong@doan-ltd.com> <5.1.1.6.2.20030901153648.0c4cb618@mail.brick.org> <00e801c370e3$6e9c73e0$e74388d9@HomeVdschrick> <5.1.1.6.2.20030901201552.0c543008@mail.brick.org>

I accept everything, and I understand it is maybe useless to talk about this
to the Lug. I talked about this to leica, and I had some first reaction like
"Leica really wants to devellop this, but the tech currently is not able,
the M system is not dead, Leica doesn't see any film supply problem in the
future". Then I gave Leica my idea of the displaced microlens, and have no
answer yet, it can come or not, I don't know.

But It is sure if Leica is not interested, and if I see everything is
technically feasable, I will try to contact some society or group to have a
prototype devellopped.

Thanks for your answer,

Best regards to all

Gregoire Vandenschrick
- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "JCB" <jcb@visualimpressions.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 5:22 AM
Subject: [Leica] Re: Re: Digital back for Leica M, sequel, precision and so
on


> At 05:36 PM 9/1/2003 -0700, Brian Reid wrote:
> >I thought it was rude, too. Let's not be rude to one another, OK?
> >
> >>I find this answer to be quite rude, but maybe, as english is only a
second
> >>language for my, this is some sort of humour, I will take it so :-).
>
>
> Please accept my apology. There was not a single nuance of rudeness
> intended. It was simply a statement that for your laying out an
engineering
> treatise, followed by truckloads of more treatises, on the LUG, just
seemed
> like a real waste. You should be talking to Leica AG. But _my_ feeling
here
> is that it would be like ...
>
> That's all I was saying.
>
> Absolutely no implied rudeness anywhere.
>
> JB
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>


- ---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.512 / Virus Database: 309 - Release Date: 20/08/2003

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Grégoire Vandenschrick <gregoire.vds@skynet.be> (Re: [Leica] Re: Digital back for Leica M, sequel, precision and so on)
Message from "Phong" <phong@doan-ltd.com> (RE: [Leica] Digital Leica M)
Message from JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com> ([Leica] Re: Digital back for Leica M, sequel, precision and so on)
Message from Grégoire Vandenschrick <gregoire.vds@skynet.be> (Re: [Leica] Re: Digital back for Leica M, sequel, precision and so on)
Message from JCB <jcb@visualimpressions.com> ([Leica] Re: Re: Digital back for Leica M, sequel, precision and so on)