Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates
From: robertmeier@usjet.net
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2003 10:34:35 -0600
References: <LNBBLBNFHNEHGFKFMALGIEGKIJAB.tim@KairosPhoto.com>

Tim,

Save your paternalism for someone else.   I know what you were talking
about.   And you dodged the question.

Bob



>
> >
> > Tim,
> >
> > You dismiss any attempt at saying you can't do something, like directing
a
> > documentary picture, as politically correct or puritan fundamentalism.
> >
> > Bob
> >
>
> Bob - please read the posts so you understand what we were talking about.
>
> we were very specifically discussing the situation where a photojournalist
> has had an award taken away because they used - in the digital realm -
what
> are very traditional tools that have been used been the darkroom by
> photojournalists for generations - and accepted as completely ethical.
>
> Because there is now a fear that as everything is digital it's all "so
easy
> to do" (actually I don't quite know what the fear is) all of a sudden
there
> is a knee-jerk reaction against any kind of aesthetic adjustment at all to
> the image.
>
> Tina's link explained this very specific issue well.
>
> The issue I raised of McCullin and Nachtwey dodging and burning the sky in
a
> photograph and then another photojournalist saying that was unacceptable
> manipulation was what I was specifically referring to as the politically
> correct or puritan fundamentalist photojournalistic "ethics" and was an
> example of this knee-jerk idiocy - or as Pedro Meyer calls it - the
fictions
> of a "Code of Ethics" .
>
> read the link Tina posted - it pretty much explains it - that's what we
were
> specifically talking about.
>
> http://www.zonezero.com/editorial/octubre03/october.html
>
> tim
>
>
>
> PS - as for "directing" documentary photography - there's no real you can
or
> you can't - the fact is people do - it just depends what form of
documentary
> photography you are talking about... it's such a broad field (probably to
> broad a field for the term to mean anything?). Mary Ellen Marks
documentary
> portraits? of course they are directed. But that was another thread
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Tim Atherton <tim@KairosPhoto.com> (RE: [Leica] Journalism, altered photo's, and other ethical debates)