Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?
From: Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 18:26:00 -0500
References: <BBDEA735.AE9%quincyogwin@bellnet.ca> <636C892D-1948-11D8-B2C0-000393AC0E1A@johnbrownlow.com> <003801c3ad5d$96f66600$6ffeab44@albyny.adelphia.net>

nope, don't intend to. I did a bit with a speed graphic which is a very 
similar set up and it was okay but the problem with street shooting on 
4x5 is just that you have to shoot too much for it to be a viable 
proposition. I carried 7 6-shot grafmatic backs and it wasn't close to 
being enough.


On Nov 17, 2003, at 5:53 PM, Bill Harting wrote:

> Are you doing any walk-around shooting with the Linhof?
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Johnny Deadman" <lists@johnbrownlow.com>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 4:52 PM
> Subject: Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?
>
>
>> Well, I had a Littman for a while but although it has certain Leica
>> aspects (its unique quality is that it has a rangefinder built into 
>> the
>> optical viewfinder) it really isn't the  Leica of 4x5. If a
>> rangefinder-in-viewfinder 4x5 is what you need, then a Littman is the
>> only game in town, but I personally found it to be an awkward kind of
>> combination. When picking up a 4x5 it is very odd not to have any
>> movements, or to be able to change lenses, which really seems like
>> about half the *point* of a 4x5 camera to me. Also the Littman is
>> really quite large. I have big hands but what it would be like for
>> someone with small hands is a bit hard to imagine.
>>
>> I just swapped the Littman for a nice Linhof Master Technika which 
>> does
>> actually *feel* a lot more like a Leica and has quite a nice
>> rangefinder too.
>>
>> On Nov 17, 2003, at 4:26 PM, Quincy Ogwin wrote:
>>
>>> On 11/16/03 9:32 PM, "Jeff S" <four_season_photo@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, no such animal exists! Lots of nicely-crafted
>>>> LF cameras out there, but there's always a tradeoff
>>>> between features and portability, and to some extent,
>>>> speed of set-up, so you'll need to prioritize. All
>>>> modern view cameras are "pro" cameras.
>>>
>>>
>>> Really, what about the Littman ? It's about as Leica as it gets for
>>> handheld
>>> work. Far more precision than that hobo thingie....
>>>
>>> Wasn't the question what's the "Leica" of LF cameras ? Then it's the
>>> Littman
>>> for sure.
>>>
>>> -=-
>>> Quincy
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, see 
>>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> John Brownlow
>>
>> http://www.pinkheadedbug.com
>> http://www.unintended-consequences.com
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe, see 
>> http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
>
- --
John Brownlow

pictures:
http://www.pinkheadedbug.com

warblog:		
http://www.unintended-consequences.com

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Quincy Ogwin <quincyogwin@bellnet.ca> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)
Message from Johnny Deadman <lists@johnbrownlow.com> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)
Message from "Bill Harting" <wharting@adelphia.net> (Re: [Leica] The Leica of LF cameras?)