Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/11/26
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Phong wrote: > > I am hoping for a bright viewfinder, low shutter lag. > Also I rather have good autofocus with good confirmation, > than poor manual focus, just for the sake of having > manual focus. I must say I have little faith that > Leica can pull off a good package, and keep the price decent. > > That said, I am moving slowly back to shooting more film. > After 3 years of giving digital my best, I still like > film better for most of my photography. My position > is contrary to many: while a digital camera will always > be part of my photographic toolbox, I anticipate that I > will be shooting more and more film, though not > necessarily 35mm film. I expect my film output in 2004 > to exceed my digital output for the first time in > 4 years. ><Snip> Some fella on some list was bemoaning the fact that he sold all his film cameras and the Aurora Borealis sky stuff he was witnessing which comes round every hundred years was much more suited for film and he kind of blew it. I assume he was getting a whole lot of noise on the digital end. "God!" I thought, "He sold every single one of his film cameras" just like thousands of other… well I wont call them names. Don't burn your bridges folks. And it's that "trading" thing I keep bemoaning about. I say if you need gear get the money to buy it! Don't get it from putting up anything not glued down on ebay. Mark Rabiner Portland, Oregon USA http://www.rabinergroup.com - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html