Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/11

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2003 09:31:32 +0100 (MET)
References: <7629EB4795F39146A4D2ECC655CD68EA2B1310@asc02.asc.upenn.edu>

I don't for a moment criticize Kyle for posting what he did. And I
remember Kyle reacting to sexist remarks several times in the past, so the
idea of Kyle being a sexist never crossed my mind.

As for the actually content of the link ... I don't see anything worth
discussing about it ... this time. I didn't see anything sexist in it,
nothing else of value either.

Daniel
Lindome Sweden, Oslo Norway



On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Kyle Cassidy wrote:

>
> Ted Said:
> >What I really feel bad about is, this is a mixed audience of ladies, >and
> I'd hope some of us are still gentlemen who look upon this kind of >crap not
> for mixed company. It's called respect of a lady!
>
> Kyle replied:
> i've stepped up to the plate every time i thought something sexist and
> innapropriate was being said in this list, at a time when _many_ of the good
> old boys on the lug thought there was nothing wrong with a little sexist
> joke between friends. which might show an interesting dichotomy in
> intergenerational gender propriety. some things that i view as sexist and
> patently offensive, someone brought up 20 years before me might see as good
> fun ribbing. and my ideas of feminism might seem bizarre in the other
> direction.
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Nathan Wajsman <n.wajsman@chello.nl> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)
In reply to: Message from Kyle Cassidy <KCassidy@asc.upenn.edu> (Re: [Leica] The fine line between art and pornography)