Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2003/12/23

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] Re: Inspired but arrested
From: Daniel Ridings <daniel.ridings@muspro.uio.no>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 15:54:20 +0100 (MET)
References: <EKEOLMMDCOMMPFPKKBLAKEAEEGAA.woc2@earthlink.net> <023a01c3c911$a9dce940$6401a8c0@lan.artvader.com>

Actually ... when you come right down to it ... there's not much happening
at a mall. They all look more or less the same (not to mention the
strip-malls) and I suspect that a lot of the motivation for not allowing
photographs is that the mall owner wants to protect his/her special little
"touch", design features that make their mall a little different from the
others.

Otherwise ... people are doing the same thing at every mall: shopping and
spending their money. In a way, it's the affluent equivalent of the bum.
The photographic possibilities are fairly limited and mundane.

So it's really no great loss.

Pics on the way ...

Daniel


On Mon, 22 Dec 2003, Jon wrote:

> I've noticed on several malls the caveat "No Cameras" never thought to
> challenge the directive simply because I never had occasion too. As far as
> "rent-a-cops" most the security cops in the malls in the San Jose area are
> off duty real cops.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>
- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from "WOC" <woc2@earthlink.net> (RE: [Leica] Re: Inspired but arrested)
Message from "Jon" <jon.stanton@comcast.net> (Re: [Leica] Re: Inspired but arrested)