Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]BTW - My point isn't to say that this proves something great about the E-1...It's to point out what a monstrosity the DigiII is given that it's a fixed lens point-and-shoot.....;-) - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of Steve Unsworth Sent: Sunday, January 04, 2004 2:29 PM To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC From the Leica web site... 135 x 82 x103 mm / approx. 5 5/16 x 3 1/4 x 4 1/16 in As opposed to the Olympus E1 that you were given which is... 141 x 104 x 81 mm (5.6 x 4.1 x 3.2 in) Steve - -----Original Message----- From: owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us [mailto:owner-leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us] On Behalf Of B. D. Colen Sent: 04 January 2004 19:16 To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us Subject: RE: [Leica] Digilux 2 vs Panasonic LC Wide angle? What, a 12 mm? It sure doesn't look that wide - and that model must be TINY. What are the dimensions - the height and width in particular? - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html