Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/07
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Daniel I think BDs got it right too, especially as non of what he cropped away gave a clue that it was Dar es Salam - the best thing thoug is that a very nice picture just turned even better Ruben Daniel Ridings wrote: >I'm one of those who (probably out of laziness in my case) don't crop >much. Funny ... when it counts (when I'm delivering a shot to someone >paying) I do. But hardly ever (well never) in my PaWs. > >BD sent me a nice crop of the water picture. I'm going to have to take >cropping seriously. > >BD's crop: > >http://folk.uio.no/danielr/images/v34-0005-51349crop.jpg > >The original: > >http://www.leica-gallery.net/dlridings/image-51349.html > >The crop is better. I'm posting this as an example of constructive >criticism this group is capable of. Sometimes that gets questioned. >Despite all our off topic rants, there are some real pros here. > >The original was taken with a 35mm lens. If I had used the 50, it would >have almost equalled the crop. My non-resolution ambition to get to know >the 50 better this year in my PAWs seems like a good idea. > >Best, > >Daniel > >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html