Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/25
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Whatever caused it, it wasn't the sensor on the camera. So it must be the adapter. That lens is certainly not at fault. Eric Welch Carlsbad, CA http://www.jphotog.com “Every normal man must be tempted at times to spit on his hands, hoist the black flag, and begin slitting throats.” H. L. Mencken On Jan 25, 2004, at 6:06 PM, John Collier wrote: > Hi Eric, > > Is the fact that his exposures were uneven with an 28 Elmarit untrue? > It seems to me he has film to show there were problems and that should > be sufficient evidence. While all three cameras may use the same > sensor, there will be implementation/software differences. Certainly > none of the cameras were design to be used with an adapter and R > lenses. The different feature sets and software of the three cameras > may well produce different results with this unintended use. > > John Collier > > On Jan 25, 2004, at 4:49 PM, Eric Welch wrote: > >> Not true. The D300 doesn't have all the spot reading and matrix >> reading (it does cost a lot less after all) but it can get every bit >> as accurate exposures as the others by anyone who is competent with >> manual metering. >> >> On Jan 25, 2004, at 2:48 PM, Howard Cummer wrote: >> >>> I have used a 28 Elmarit on a Canon 300D and the exposure was uneven >>> so I think that you may need more input from other users as to >>> whether the 300D is absolutely suitable. For the Canon D60 and 10D >>> the exposure variability does not exist as the cameras can be set >>> manually while on the 300D mores settings are automatically >>> controlled by the camera. > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html