Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/01/31

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] digital in low light
From: sam <sam@osheaven.net>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2004 21:21:28 -0500
References: <152.29b08df6.2d4d03bc@aol.com> <00cd01c3e84d$f159b5e0$388a8418@symkeehx5nw8g8> <00ca01c3e866$fb720e10$6401a8c0@basecamp2win>

I don't understand why you say digital outperforms film. In what way?

Sam S


Jim Laurel wrote:
> Well, I can't speak for other DSLRs, but in my experience, the Canon 1Ds and
> 10D outperform film at every ISO rating.  I am a long-tom Noctilux user, but
> after using these cameras for a while, I must admit that I now reach for the
> DSLRs for shooting low light.  It has to be said, though, that the Noctilux
> still produces a look you cannot get anywhere else.
> 
> Now, I know someone will say that you can't tell much from a 640px long jpg,
> but here are some snaps:
> 
> Ali in his tent near Mhamid, Maroc.  Canon 1Ds with EF 70-200 f2.8 IS USM (a
> truly amazing lens) -- 1/25th sec @ f2.8  ISO 400
> http://www.spectare.com/gallery/Maroc%2003%20Gallery/source/20cw1382.htm
> 
> My kids by firelight.  Canon 10D with EF 35mm f2.0 -- 1/20th sec @ f2.0  ISO
> 800
> http://www.spectare.com/gallery/Maroc%2003%20Gallery/source/crw_4446.htm
> 
> Essouira Medina.  Canon 10D with EF 35mm f2.0 - 1/125 @ f2.0  ISO 1600
> http://www.spectare.com/gallery/Maroc%2003%20Gallery/source/crw_4557.htm
> 
> My friend Martin Field lit by a single candle.  Canon 10D with EF 35mm
> f2.0 -- 1/15 sec @ f2.0  ISO 1600
> http://www.spectare.com/gallery/Maroc%2003%20Gallery/source/crw_4572.htm
> 
> Digital is cool, no doubt.
> 
> --Jim
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl>
> To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
> Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2004 2:59 PM
> Subject: [Leica] digital in low light
> 
> 
> 
>>Hi from what i read every where,a 10+megapixel camera will do better
>>resolution wise then a slow film.
>>Do any of you know of a link or publication   that explains at what iso
> 
> the
> 
>>crossover is to 35mm,s film better performance.
>>A  friend of mine who does pro sport showed me some low light stuff made
>>with his top Canon and it was allmost scary.
>>Please tell me there is some use left in my Noctilux.
>>Thanks
>>simon jessurun
>>p.s not that i will ever sell it or the M3 that was adjusted for it
>>
>>--
>>To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
> 
> 

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

Replies: Reply from Eric Welch <eric@jphotog.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
Reply from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)
In reply to: Message from Teresa299@aol.com (Re: [Leica] Fw: [Large Format] Beth Keiser Shoots B&W 4x5 ForCampaign Coverage)
Message from "animal" <s.jessurun95@chello.nl> ([Leica] digital in low light)
Message from "Jim Laurel" <jplaurel@nwlink.com> (Re: [Leica] digital in low light)