Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/02/04
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]That is interesting, I have not compared the 560 f6.8 I shall do so when I get home - I am in Barcelona on business at the moment. Frank > from: grduprey@rockwellcollins.com > date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:38:40 > to: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lens question > > > > > > I compared the Canon 500/4 to my 560/6.8 Telyt and there was no comparison > the 560 won easily, my wife's opinion, by the way without knowing which was > which. > > Gene > > > > > Frank Dernie > <Frank.Dernie@btinternet.com To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us > > cc: > Sent by: Subject: Re: [Leica] Leica R lens question > owner-leica-users@mejac.palo > -alto.ca.us > > > 02/02/2004 07:46 PM > Please respond to > leica-users > > > > > > > I became a little disappointed by my 280 f2,8 after I treated myself to > a 500 f4 Canon. I know it is much more recent but it is very noticeably > superior in sharpness and boke. > Frank > > On Monday, February 2, 2004, at 09:21 pm, grduprey@rockwellcollins.com > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > For me the 90/2.8 Elmarit, the 560/6.8 are excellent. I would also > > have to > > say the 100/2.8 Macro, and the 280/2.8 are at the top of the list. > > > > Gene > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html