Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: Re: [Leica] buyer beware - some facts
From: "Keith R. Wessel" <keith@wbalaw.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:46:39 -0600
References: <3.0.6.32.20040303181402.00857310@POP6.sympatico.ca> <010301c4017a$5bb912b0$f131d742@clearsighjhm83>

Close for small claims in Wisconsin where the limit is $5,000

- ----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com>
To: <leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us>
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 5:50 PM
Subject: [Leica] buyer beware - some facts


> If I were to sell (as I do) items on consignment, I would not pay the
> original owner until the buyer notifies me that he is satisfied with the
> transaction. No reputable dealer or reseller would do any different.
>
> The buyer should have used an escrow service in order to protect himself.
> As much as we trust one another it is a good policy to establish terms of
> purchase beforehand. An escrow service would have avoided all the chagrin.
> If the seller refuses to accommodate a customer for such a large
> expenditure, then look elsewhere.
>
> The police will not get involved as it is a civil matter. The dealer
> delivered the goods. If the goods are flawed, that is a matter to be
> ascertained and argued. If there is a legitimate claim then the buyer's
only
> recourse is suing the seller. Small claims court would not be the venue as
> the amount in question is higher than most courts will allow. Lets hear
from
> Louis Nizers on the LUG on these points.
>
> Joe Codispoti
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html
>

- --
To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html

In reply to: Message from Dan C <leicaman@sympatico.ca> (Re: [Leica] Re: buyer beware)
Message from "Joseph Codispoti" <joecodi@clearsightusa.com> ([Leica] buyer beware - some facts)