Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/03/09
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]My experience is that if you print (i.e. chemical process), Portra seems to prints better on color paper than TCN. I heard that Portra supposed to scan better than TCN but I have not noticed much of a difference. Isaku >From: Adam Bridge <abridge@mac.com> >Reply-To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us >Subject: [Leica] Portra and TCN >Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 12:43:17 -0700 > >I've only been shooting TCN which scans wonderfully well. I use it for those >times when I either can't process or own film or don't want to mess with it, >although I've slipped into doing portraiture with TCN and I like very much what >it does for skin tones. > >So what's the difference between them? Besides Portra being more expensive. Is >there any reason to consider it? > >For my purposes I scan almost everything and print to piezography or 2200. > >Adam >-- >To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html _________________________________________________________________ $BM'C#$H(B24$B;~4V%[%C%H%i%$%s!V(BMSN $B%a%C%;%s%8%c!<!W!":#$9$0%@%&%s%m!<%I!*(B http://messenger.msn.co.jp - -- To unsubscribe, see http://mejac.palo-alto.ca.us/leica-users/unsub.html