Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/07

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] A PAW for May that may not work...
From: frankandaubrey at mindspring.com (Frank Farmer)
Date: Fri May 7 08:20:49 2004

Jim,

I agree.  I love the highlights of the faces in the rows behind the front row.
I adds a beautiful depth to the photo.  Very well done.

Frank

-----Original Message-----
From: Ted Grant <tedgrant@shaw.ca>
Sent: May 7, 2004 12:25 AM
To: Leica Users Group <lug@leica-users.org>
Subject: Re: [Leica] A PAW for May that may not work...

Jim McIntyre showed:
Subject: [Leica] A PAW for May that may not work...


> Not sure if this one worked. Taken during the Easter Vigil, late on Easter
> Saturday night. Hard to meter, hard to scan, hard to get the tones right/
> But it's a post.
>
> http://members.rogers.com/jmcdesigns/jamesstreet/PAW/05-07-2004.htm<<

Hi Jim,
I don't see what didn't work, as any shot made with candle light at night
outside and is as sharp as this and not blown out, is a shot well done. You
did a cracker jack job.

Besides most people would be popping flash thinking it was impossible to
shoot in the dark by candle light. I've covered many candle-light vigils and
shot only with candle light because why would one use flash?  It's "hello
what don't you understand, it's a candle light vigil."  So why would a
photographer blow away the candle light effect by popping a twinkie light.

But you did a damn fine job on this one.

ted


_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] A PAW for May that may not work...)