Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/17

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Mon May 17 18:44:31 2004

I'll use your 1:3 rec as a starting point. Thanks!

Jeffery Smith
New Orleans, LA


-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+jls=runbox.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf Of Mark
Rabiner
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 8:25 PM
To: Leica Users Group
Subject: Re: [Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans
best? - OT

On 5/17/04 5:39 PM, "Jeffery Smith" <jls@runbox.com> wrote:

> I took BD's hint and bought 5 rolls of Tri-X. Mark, what do you soup
in?
> XTOL I hope.
> 
> Jeffery Smith
> New Orleans, LA
> 
> 
The first time I ever used Xtol it was with tri x it was June '99. The
year
the fire froze. I souped it 1:2 but the photographer down the street
humiliated me into going the full 1:3 route which I soon wish I'd
started
with in the first place as that brick of film had a slightly higher mush
factor. But only to the scale of .021!  :)

Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon



New-improved
http://rabinergroup.com/



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from mcintyre at ca.inter.net (Jim McIntyre) ([Leica] Musical PAWs)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)