Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/18

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT
From: dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory)
Date: Tue May 18 06:36:36 2004

Eric,
The grain gets a little smaller, more like Delta 400.  Also, the
grayscale seems to be a little longer than at 1:3.

My daughter did a series of 11X enlargements that had virtually no grain
so why mess with success?

Don
dorysrus@mindspring.com

-----Original Message-----
From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
[mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
Of Eric
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2004 5:50 AM
To: leica-users@mejac.palo-alto.ca.us
Subject: [Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans
best? -OT

Don:

>My B&W developer of choice is Xtol, usually at 1:3 but lately 1:2 for
>Fuji Neopan 1600. 

Just curious...what do you see with Neopan 1600 at 1:2 that you like
better
than at 1:3?

--
Eric
http://canid.com/

_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information



Replies: Reply from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? -OT)
In reply to: Message from ericm at pobox.com (Eric) ([Leica] Re: Scanning silver halide films - which one scans best? - OT)