Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/05/28

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Summilux - why a new one?
From: daniel.ridings at muspro.uio.no (Daniel Ridings)
Date: Fri May 28 11:59:20 2004
References: <00d001c44424$05215b00$6701a8c0@CCA4A5EF37E11E> <49CA0830-B0D3-11D8-BF30-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca> <40B788A0.4040203@Hemenway.com>

Class, Jim. They're hip!

Daniel


On Fri, 28 May 2004, Jim Hemenway wrote:

> I have a Leitz Wetzlar Summilux-R f1:4/50 S#31698xx, non-Rom, 3 cam lens
> which I use on both the R8 and the SL.
>
> It has a very convenient one-part sliding lenshood which works quite
> well, and the lens itself produces great photos... at least to my eye
> and to a few brides.
>
> So, what am I missing?  What do the newer 50mm Summilux lenses have that
> I need?
>
> This isn't a rhetorical question... I really want to know.
>
> Jim
>
> P.S. Focusing tab?  Is that something found on M, but not R glass?
>
>
>
> John Collier wrote:
>
> > Crazy, yes but it is not funny!
> >
> > :-)
> >
> > I tried out the current Summilux at the LHSA spring shoot and I was
> > pleased with the results. Only two things annoyed me. The
> > auto-collapsing hood and that there was no focusing tab. The new 'lux
> > solves both and may even match the performance of my 35/1.4 Asph. That
> > is nothing to sneeze at.
> >
> > I love(d) my Noctilux but the 1m close focus limit is something I was
> > constantly finding myself fighting. Once or twice is no problem but
> > constantly means I like to work closer with my 50s. If it isn't fitting
> > the bill, it has to go.
> >
> > So take that you digital curmudgeon :-)
> >
> > John Collier
> >
> > PS: It is spoken for.
> > On May 27, 2004, at 1:51 PM, B. D. Colen wrote:
> >
> >> ROFLOL!! :-)
> >>
> >> John Collier wrote:
> >>
> >> Well I am going to take the plunge on the new Summilux so here is my
> >> Noctilux for sale.
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Leica Users Group.
> > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>

Replies: Reply from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Summilux - why a new one?)
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] FS: Noctilux)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] FS: Noctilux)
Message from Jim at hemenway.com (Jim Hemenway) ([Leica] Summilux - why a new one?)