Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/07/03
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat Jul 3 12:48:44 2004
References: <5.2.0.9.2.20040703111212.0160b030@mail.infoave.net> <BD0BEE2E.F62B%mark@rabinergroup.com> <5.2.0.9.2.20040703111212.0160b030@mail.infoave.net>
At 06:43 PM 7/3/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>I believe Mark's objection to the NY Noir was that the photographers were
>not identified. Here they are. So I guess your only complaint is that the
>prices are low. But what is wrong with that? To me, this is like buying an
>Ansel Adams calendar for $25.
>
>Nathan
I sell fine art photographic prints. I can't make them for $17.95.
Tina
Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com
Replies:
Reply from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)
Reply from tedgrant at shaw.ca (Ted Grant) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark'sscrew up)
In reply to:
Message from images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)
Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography)
Message from n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)