Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/03

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up
From: images at InfoAve.Net (Tina Manley)
Date: Sat Jul 3 12:56:55 2004

At 06:43 PM 7/3/2004 +0200, you wrote:
>I believe Mark's objection to the NY Noir was that the photographers were 
>not identified. Here they are. So I guess your only complaint is that the 
>prices are low. But what is wrong with that? To me, this is like buying an 
>Ansel Adams calendar for $25.
>
>Nathan


And I can pretty much guarantee that the named photographers are not making 
a penny from these sales.  Getty has RF rights to many, many photos and can 
do  anything they want with them, including selling fine art prints.


Tina


Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com



_______________________________________________
Leica Users Group.
See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information

Tina Manley, ASMP
www.tinamanley.com


http://www.pdiphotos.com
http://www.workbookstock.com
http://www.newscom.com
http://www.americanphotojournalist.com



Replies: Reply from n.wajsman at chello.nl (Nathan Wajsman) ([Leica] New York Times anonymous fine art photography Now Mark's screw up)