Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/07/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Digital M
From: bladman99 at yahoo.ca (Dan C)
Date: Mon Jul 12 11:39:41 2004
References: <NEBBJDFBIKOBILIKPPBNOEOEPOAA.red735i@earthlink.net>
 
For one thing, the EOS isn't exactly a pocket sized camera, for those
wishing discression.

-dan c.

At 02:09 PM 12-07-04 -0400, B. D. Colen wrote:
>Digital cameras are not 'just boxes.' The sensor and firmware have an
>enormous amount to do with the quality of the image produced. And I
>didn't, btw, say anything about the 'look' of the camera; I said
>'similar build and image quality.' As in build quality and image
>quality. Or, to put it really bluntly, why would anyone in his or her
>right mind pay 5500K - for example - for an "M" body when for the same
>amount of money he or she could buy an 8 mpg Canon Eos MkII and an array
>of Canon's best lenses? I know, I know, it's not a Leica, and it
>wouldn't take your m lenses. ;-)
[snip]
Replies: Reply from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Digital M)
 In reply to: Message from red735i at earthlink.net (Frank Filippone) ([Leica] Digital M)
Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Digital M)