Archived posting to the
Leica Users Group, 2004/08/17
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index]
[Home]
[Search]
Subject: [Leica] Re: the first IIIg
From: reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid)
Date: Tue Aug 17 10:10:08 2004
References: <412238F2.5060706@cox.net>
In my opinion a fake Leica is of equal value to the original, as long as it
is a well-made fake. A fake Leica that takes bad photographs is of course
not useful.
Replies:
Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Re: the first IIIg)
Reply from jcb at visualimpressions.com (JCB) ([Leica] Re: Re: the first IIIg)
Reply from raikorho at uusikaupunki.fi (Raimo K) ([Leica] Re: the first IIIg)
In reply to:
Message from doubs43 at cox.net (Walker Smith) ([Leica] Re: the first IIIg)