Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/01

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Leica Ig?
From: leicachris at worldnet.att.net (Christopher Williams)
Date: Wed Sep 1 05:42:58 2004
References: <00a001c48f95$c9fbadb0$6501a8c0@ccapr.com><1093985428.4760.12.camel@failsafe> <p05111002bd5adaac9ded@[192.168.102.100]>
 
My father-in-law has a Ig that was converted to a IIIg. The self-timer was
not added though. Guess it's a IIga :)

Chris

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karen Nakamura"
Subject: [Leica] Leica Ig?


>
> I've never seen something like this, is it for real?
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3836002726
>
> It looks too real to be a fake. So it's the Ig (finderless version)
> of the IIIg?  Didn't Leica have the M1/MD by then?
>
> Karen
In reply to: Message from bdcolen at earthlink.net (B. D. Colen) ([Leica] Lenses without digital Bodies, Anyone?)
Message from feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio) ([Leica] Lenses without digital Bodies, Anyone?)
Message from mail at gpsy.com (Karen Nakamura) ([Leica] Leica Ig?)