Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/09/15

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Digilux digressions and dioramas part II, the beginning
From: feli at creocollective.com (Feli di Giorgio)
Date: Wed Sep 15 10:39:10 2004
References: <BD6D000B.626F%mark@rabinergroup.com>

THIS right here is one of the main reasons why I subscribe to the LUG.
;-)

Feli



On Tue, 2004-09-14 at 20:07, Mark Rabiner wrote:
> The Oscar Barnack tie-ins throws me.
> We are commemorating his birthday.
> Not death day or day he invented the Leica.
> 
> But he wasn't born in 1904 otherwise he would have been 9 when he came out
> with the first UR prototype. Just like Mozart writing his first symphony!
> Big deal!
> 
> But Barnack was not a prodigy type from what I can tell.
> 
> So what we are looking at is the 125th birthday of Barnack!!
> Which would make that 1879.
> Which by the way is a year not a day.
> Nowhere can I find what his birthday was. Just year.
> 
> Anyway I think 100 is a nice round number.
> So is 200
> So is maybe 50. Your golden wedding anniversary.
> Maybe on a stretch 150.
> But 125?
> 
> I've got to get out my pocket calculator to find out when Oscar was born.
> 
> I think they should have come up with another nice number.
>     Which added or multiplied up to be 2004.
> And was much ROUNDER!
> 
> 
> Mark Rabiner
> Photography
> Portland Oregon
> http://rabinergroup.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
-- 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Feli di Giorgio
Visual Effects Supervisor "Hostage"
creocollective - feli@creocollective.com


Replies: Reply from reid at mejac.palo-alto.ca.us (Brian Reid) ([Leica] Digilux digressions and dioramas part II, the beginning)
Reply from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Digilux digressions and dioramas part II, the beginning)
In reply to: Message from mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner) ([Leica] Digilux digressions and dioramas part II, the beginning)