Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/06

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Impressions of the LUG
From: jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith)
Date: Wed Oct 6 14:33:38 2004
References: <6.0.1.1.2.20041006160928.01d6ac60@pop.runbox.com> <000101c4abea$f23a23d0$6401a8c0@dorysrusp4>

You left the part out about kissing it goodbye for 6 months.


At 04:25 PM 10/6/2004, you wrote:
>Jeffery,
>Repairing the meter of your M5 is the utmost in simplicity: write a
>check for about $250, attach it to your camera, mail it to Sherri K.,
>and attach a letter saying FIX PLEASE.
>
>Sherri will probably send you a bill for MORE MONEY PLEASE and then all
>will be well.  :)
>
>Don
>dorysrus@mindspring.com
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org
>[mailto:lug-bounces+dorysrus=mindspring.com@leica-users.org] On Behalf
>Of Jeffery Smith
>Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2004 4:13 PM
>To: Leica Users Group
>Subject: Re: [Leica] Impressions of the LUG
>
>You should have been here last week. It was the Zeiss-Ikon forum.
>
>It hasn't been histrionic lately. I expected a outpouring of who won the
>
>debate talk, but I think we are actually all so tired of hearing our own
>
>bullshit, it finally has been reaching an extinction phase........
>
>Leica hasn't been coming out with many new innovations in the preceding
>year. So we SHOULD be talking about techniques, books of images,
>galleries
>of images, and how to get the meter on an M5 repaired. We SHOULD.
>
>Jeffery
>
>At 03:33 PM 10/6/2004, you wrote:
> >Hi LUGgers
> >
> >I haven't subscribed to the LUG for a good year or three  - principally
>
> >because:
> >
> >a) Most of the discussion didn't appear to have anything to do with
>Leicas.
> >
> >b) Flame wars (normally OT) were rampant.
> >
> >I subscribed again recently to find it (mostly) courteous and (mostly)
> >on-topic.
> >
> >There also be a number of the 'usual suspects' knocking around from the
>
> >previous era.
> >
> >Tell me guys, has this group really undergone a sea-change? If so, I
>might
> >even stick around.
> >
> >Best
> >
> >Alex
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >Alex Hurst
> >Waterfall
> >Nr. Cork
> >Ireland
> >
> >Tel: +353 214 543 328 (H)
> >        +353 214 270 907 (W)
> >
> >Fax: +353 214 271 248
> >email: corkflor@iol.ie
> >Also: corkflor.2@virgin.net (when in the UK, which isn't often)
> >Home website: http://www.iol.ie/~corkflor/
> >Business website: http://www.corkflorists.com/
> >
> >Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) public key available at:
> >http://pgpkeys.mit.edu:11371
> >ID: 0x5BB72019
> >_______________________________________________
> >Leica Users Group.
> >See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


Replies: Reply from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Impressions of the LUG)
In reply to: Message from jls at runbox.com (Jeffery Smith) ([Leica] Impressions of the LUG)
Message from dorysrus at mindspring.com (Don Dory) ([Leica] Impressions of the LUG)