Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M
From: jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier)
Date: Tue Oct 19 18:22:36 2004
References: <83170-2200410219114018509@M2W103.mail2web.com> <006801c4b5f0$9672c920$6501a8c0@roman>
 
The first version had its own dedicated shade. The second version uses 
the same shade as the 21 Asph and 24 Asph. Both shades were/are not 
included with the lens.

John Collier

On Oct 19, 2004, at 9:30 AM, Jacques Bilinski wrote:

>> Does the first version need a separate hood or does it have built-in
> hood?
>
> I've never heard of a chrome 2nd version. I have a chrome 1st version. 
> The
> front element is quite recessed but there is no built-in lenshood. A 
> hood
> from one of the WA lenses (I forget which one) will work but is not
> included. Be aware that the chrome version is quite a bit heavier than 
> the
> black one.
Replies: Reply from henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)
 In reply to: Message from leirex at access4less.net (leirex@access4less.net) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)
Message from jbilin at axionet.com (Jacques Bilinski) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)