Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/10/19

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M
From: henningw at archiphoto.com (Henning Wulff)
Date: Tue Oct 19 20:01:28 2004
References: <83170-2200410219114018509@M2W103.mail2web.com> <006801c4b5f0$9672c920$6501a8c0@roman> <37AA6F6E-222E-11D9-AC96-0050E42E6E0B@shaw.ca>

>The first version had its own dedicated shade. The second version 
>uses the same shade as the 21 Asph and 24 Asph. Both shades were/are 
>not included with the lens.
>
>John Collier

It's the other way around, John.

>On Oct 19, 2004, at 9:30 AM, Jacques Bilinski wrote:
>
>>>Does the first version need a separate hood or does it have built-in
>>hood?
>>
>>I've never heard of a chrome 2nd version. I have a chrome 1st version. The
>>front element is quite recessed but there is no built-in lenshood. A hood
>>from one of the WA lenses (I forget which one) will work but is not
>>included. Be aware that the chrome version is quite a bit heavier than the
>>black one.
>
>_______________________________________________
>Leica Users Group.
>See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information


-- 
    *            Henning J. Wulff
   /|\      Wulff Photography & Design
  /###\   mailto:henningw@archiphoto.com
  |[ ]|     http://www.archiphoto.com

Replies: Reply from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)
In reply to: Message from leirex at access4less.net (leirex@access4less.net) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)
Message from jbilin at axionet.com (Jacques Bilinski) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)
Message from jbcollier at shaw.ca (John Collier) ([Leica] Chrome Tri-Elmar-M)