Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/11/12

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?
From: mark at rabinergroup.com (Mark Rabiner)
Date: Fri Nov 12 17:43:30 2004
 
On 11/12/04 2:32 PM, "Douglas Herr" <telyt@earthlink.net> typed:

> Mark Rabiner <mark@rabinergroup.com> wrote:
> 
>>> 
>>> CL     : 121x76x32 for 510gr with 40/2
>>> R3a   :135.5x81x 33.5mm, 430 grams (w/o lens)
>>> 
> 
>> 80 grams lighter!! (2.8 oz)
> 
> The R3a weight is w/o lens.  I bet a 40/2 weighs more than 2.8 oz.
> 
> 


Oops

My 40mm Summicron weighs 4 oz on my kitchen scale.
Rubber hood .5 oz.

Is there a lighter Leica lens? It's sure lighter than Karen's silver
collapsible Elmar 50 current.

Mark Rabiner
Photography
Portland Oregon
http://rabinergroup.com/
In reply to: Message from telyt at earthlink.net (Douglas Herr) ([Leica] The Leica CL ! or Bessa R3A ?)