Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/27

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]
Subject: [Leica]What is the least amount of equipment you can use?
From: masonster at gmail.com (David Mason)
Date: Mon Dec 27 14:29:02 2004
References: <41D088BB.6050601@adrenaline.com> <ILENJKCCOJOKJFHFEFACAECFCGAA.luisripoll@telefonica.net>
 
I always take way too  much with me except one trip to NYC when I just
took a canonet ql17 - I should do that more often.

Dave


On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 23:25:53 +0100, Luis Ripoll
<luisripoll@telefonica.net> wrote:
> Of course it depends of the trip, my least equipment will be a M6 or MP 
> with
> a Summilux 50, if I'm in business the small Elmar-M 2,8/50 or the 
> Tri-Elmar.
> But the outfit I'm most happy is 21 - 35 - 75, with this great equipment I
> don't need a bag, I put the lenses in my pockets (I think was H.C.B. who
> said "never look as a photographer"), if I go with a bag I add a Summilux 
> 50
> and a second M body.
> 
> Saludos desde Barcelona,
> Luis Ripoll
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Leica Users Group.
> See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information
> 
>
In reply to: Message from scott at adrenaline.com (Scott McLoughlin) ([Leica]What is the least amount of equipment you can use?)
Message from luisripoll at telefonica.net (Luis Ripoll) ([Leica]What is the least amount of equipment you can use?)