Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2004/12/27
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]help. my i's turned into o's!! On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:08:45 -0500, David Mason <masonster@gmail.com> wrote: > I can't omagone why no one says anything after your posts. > > > On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 17:04:51 -0600, Curtis Fant <surrealistic@cox.net > > wrote: > > That stupid girl in KC said she left her phone in the car cause she > > thought I wasn't coming to MO. > > > > She wants to marry me or something. That girl in San Diego said "she > > excels at being a fuck toy". > > > > On the leica list they are arguing about the least amount of camera > > equipment to take on a trip. > > > > Whenever I post, no one says anything. I think it's time for Whizzer > > Stenkelteeth to post... > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Frank Filippone > > To: Leica Users Group > > Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 4:49 PM > > Subject: RE: [Leica]What is the least amount of equipment you can use? > > > > I use the rule of doubling..... > > 1 M6 plus 15, 35/2 or 1.4, 75 > > OR > > 1 M6 plus 15, 50/1.4, 90TE Thin > > While this is not the lightest outfit possible, it does what I want. > > Fast > > lenses, low ( not ultra low) weight. > > If I want a really light kit...... M6 with 35/2 . That is almost as > > light > > as it gets with M6 cameras. > > > > Always: Hoods, but no filters, no flash, just film. TMX100. Plus an > > emergency roll of Fuji ASA 200 Print FIlm. > > > > Since I got the 35/1.4, it may go instead of the 35/2. The weight is > > marginally the same, but you get an extra stop when you need it.... > > > > Frank Filippone > > red735i@earthlink.net > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > _______________________________________________ > > Leica Users Group. > > See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information > > > > >