Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/02/16
[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]Frank, I'm agree that Erwin is more scientific, what I was read was about the sense you say, that Lux at 1.4 is not so good as the Cron at F2. Personnally I don't have the experience with both lenses to compare them, but it seems me that the opinion of Putts about that up to 5,6 both lenses are similar, even maybe the Lux was better (Putss wrote). Saludos cordiales, Luis -----Mensaje original----- De: lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org [mailto:lug-bounces+luisripoll=telefonica.net@leica-users.org]En nombre de Frank Filippone Enviado el: jueves, 10 de febrero de 2005 23:57 Para: Leica Users Group Asunto: RE: [Leica] Which 35mm 'cron or 'lux? My precise ( ???) testing says the 1.4 classic lens is NOT as good wide open or at F2 as the Classic F2 lens. Stopped down, I doubt there is little difference... but I did not test this. The F2 is a really good lens. There is 1 issue I did not bring up.... the issue of lens clarity or haze. Make sure that any lens you buy is CLEAR. I am not talking about little spots of dust, but rather the haze from the lubricants that comes with lenses made in the 60 and 70's... roughly the serial number range of 2M to 2.6M. Haze is possible to remove, but why bother when if you look a little longer, you can find a clean lens...... Theses lenses are not rare.....thgere are "millions" of them out there...... Erwin is a more precise tester, and more scientific. But I do not know what he said on this isue. Frank Filippone red735i@earthlink.net I remember I have read on the Leica Lens book of Erwin Putts that NON ASPH 1,4 up to 5,6 is even better than Summicron NON ASPH, and that at f2 both are similar, but maybe better the Summicron. Do you agree this opinion? Saludos cordiales, Luis _______________________________________________ Leica Users Group. See http://leica-users.org/mailman/listinfo/lug for more information