Archived posting to the Leica Users Group, 2005/03/05

[Author Prev] [Author Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Author Index] [Topic Index] [Home] [Search]

Subject: [Leica] Re: Is that so wrong?
From: feli2 at earthlink.net (Feli)
Date: Sat Mar 5 12:43:53 2005
References: <BE4FC6DA.BCF%philippe.orlent@pandora.be>

On Mar 5, 2005, at 11:28 AM, Philippe Orlent wrote:
>>
> I seem to have missed the last posts on this topic. What image is Feli
> referring to?
>
> Thanks,
> Philippe
>

A straight photo with a minimum of manipulation, versus something that 
has been heavily
modified in photoshop. We were discussing at what point a photo turns 
into something else,
perhaps a photomontage or a graphic, depending on the amount of 
manipulation it has been
subjected to. Someone mentioned that they went to a photo show where 
they saw heavily
photoshopped images being judged along side more traditional photos. I 
felt that they were
two different things and should be divided into separate categories.


feli


________________________________________________________
feli2@earthlink.net                     2 + 2 = 4                      
www.elanphotos.com


Replies: Reply from kennybod at mac.com (Kenneth Frazier) ([Leica] Re: Is that so wrong?)
Reply from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Is that so wrong?)
In reply to: Message from philippe.orlent at pandora.be (Philippe Orlent) ([Leica] Re: Is that so wrong?)